Connecting Using IPv6

Javascript is disabled

Connecting with IPv6 in Windows 8
Post as a guest Name. This is not going to happen. Sign up using Facebook. Thanks for Killing Silverlight says: I feel it was a travesty not having it on release a couple of years ago; claiming that most current products are IPv6 ready and not acknowledging this gaping hole is just ridiculous. They probably also have enough IP addresses already so it's not like they have a problem which actually needs fixing. Thats not the issue, all drivers are the latest

Same problem


As regards deprecation of 6to4, it is indeed only a recommendation currently, applying only to a specific subset of 6to4. It seems that 6to4 is no longer recommended for new deployments. NAT64 at least as described here: Stateless translation is appropriate when a NAT64 translator is used in front of IPv4-only servers to allow them to be reached by remote IPv6-only clients.

Stateful translation is suitable for deployment at the client side or at the service provider, allowing IPv6-only client hosts to reach remote IPv4-only nodes. Technically, this is not impossible: Assuming you find a relay to use, that relay will handle the IPv4 connection on your behalf, making their IP v4 address the source the destination will see. It might however make sense to see if all this can be avoided, either by finding the IPv6 address for the service if there is one , or by using IPv4 - since your server has both, it seems a lot easier to just speak IPv4 than it does involving extra hops and complexity to your service.

Updated to reflect Sander Steffann 's comments: So while it does remain possible to do what the asker was wanting, 6to4 is not the proper way of doing it. By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy , and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. TRiG 7 Andrey Melnik 13 1 4. When i resolve Microsoft. Nice job Microsoft keeping up with the times.

I love metro on the desktop and think it will be brilliant once you remove aero and put metro on everything. However I'm having issues with the release preview where the PC will randomly freeze from time to time from an unknown issue. I think it relates to internet usage. Chrome is most likely to crash the machine but internet explorer is doing it too. If music is playing, it will sound like its jumping and then slowly you loose mouse control where finally you can do nothing.

There is NO blue screens involved. Linux bring it later and Apple introduced it in or 11 with Mac There are people who say it sucks, and others who say it rocks. I mean, is this some kind of kindergarten here, or what?

Microsoft, or the Windows team, won't change their mind because of your whining, so get over it. If you don't need any of the new features of Windows 8, it's just OK to stick with Windows 7 and wait and see what the future will bring. Maybe this Windows release will be the beginning of a change, and your next PC operating system might not be Windows anymore. No one is forcing you to use what you don't like. It's still your decision. Now, please focus on the topic.

I think there's only one thing to criticize about Metro: It's current limitations, and that Microsoft is going the Apple-way now, heading to a closed-down system.

When will Jailbreak for Windows be released to fix this? It search, find and open cmd automagically. Now, In windows 8 to open the cmd, I press WindowKey and type cmd yes don't need to click search just type ON metro as soon as it comes and press enter.

Same goes for logout. On windows 7, if your default power action is shutdown, you press WindowKey, click on small arrow with shutdown and click on logout. In Windows 8, you press WindowKey click on your name at top right corner and click Sign out. Microsoft, please disable or gray-out the icons for those charms with whom the current app has no contract. I just upgrade Windows 8 to Windows 7 it feels so nice to use windows 7 after using W8 it feels futuristic.

I dont like Windows 8 Bad service pack. I rather stick to windows 7 when i can pin a lot of programs on my start menu, and in one click i see them all. I have to admit that my initial reaction almost a year back was a bit "meh". I wonder why people here don't understand what way Microsoft is going.

They are going the same way as Cr Apple. Locking in their users to buy apps only through their store so they can earn a lot of money. I as a desktop user want freedom to choose where i buy software and i want my freedom to choose what i install.

Microsoft will probably try to prevent this freedom by force Metro down their users throats. I will ofcourse not stay faithful to Microsoft, even if i have used Windows since NT4. The only way to go in the future, if Microsoft continue this BS is to move to Linux. Cr Apple is no alternative, they already do what Microsoft plan to do. Too bad they still don't understand what way Microsoft want to go! In fact, RFC support would further instigate fragmentation of the network configuration space and make it harder for software and hardware partners to engineer IPv6 support.

RFC discuses some of the principles of host configurations, including the value of minimizing diversity section 2. As comments aren't accepted there so, I had to ask it here, Multi-Monitor's good but did you check as I'm not able to run metro apps on both displays at the same time, for instance if I'm running music app on one display and go on to select start page on another display, well the music app on the other display minimizes it-self and all I see is desktop view on the other display.

I wonder how many comments would be left if you'd filter out all the Metro-related ones…: Metro is the only thing wrong with Windows 8, but it's the biggest part of Windows 8, thus the biggest problem. Windows 8 is going to be a huge flop. Guess, Microsoft will learn only after failure. Why is a majority of users, in these comments, talking about Metro apps and development on an article primarily about the transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6?

If you wana decide wheter you like Windows 8 or not, give it a try and make your own impressions. Took a few tweaks to get working but nothing too bad.

Would it be possible for you guys to route the notifications from desktop to Metro, if the user is currently in Metro environment? I've just read the new blog entry on how you improved the metro media apps. Um…How about improving and updating the windows media player making that faster and quicker and all that great stuff you are doing for metro.

Desktop users would like a better program for media and basic dvd playback but yet you aren't going to give us either. It hasn't been updated in a LONG time. Fix the playback issues the sluggishness and basically improve it like how you improved the media metro apps. I find it offensive that you are completley ignoring the desktop users and the programs we use.

How about improving those? Xbox is ugly and too green. Also stop closing comments on the blog before we even get a chance to voice opinions.

Expecting updates to windows media player that hasn't been updated in a LONG time. Updates to zune software. Basically updates to the all desktop media programs. But nope hasn't happened. The metro media app track bar is hideous specifically the square tracker. Should look a little more alive. This is not going to happen. Microsoft wants that these clients get ported to Metro. So they will not do anything that makes using them like it was before. Metro and desktop are incompatible in any aspect an Microsoft wants you to live with it.

This post was published 3 days ago and I can comment, "Building a rich and extensible media platform" post was published only 16 hours ago and I can't comment there! Darren, it is very possible and the guys on Windows user experience team are on it. Rest assured, Metro and Desktop, they ain't incompatible!

Dan, the trouble there is, people were misusing the comment system and bashing each other if you go through the previous comments. I guess Microsoft should impose the access control, so only signed user can post comment. For example I like Microsoft products and I do criticize if they I find any screw up in them. But since I dont use Apple products, I wont go to their blogs for mere trolling. Now, on each MSDN blog you will find lots of lapdogs coming from other communities and trolling with groundless points.

Thats what I hate about an open comment system. Then I guess its just me.. IPv6 is the future Microsoft, along with other technology companies, has been working on the deployment of IPv6 to ensure that end-users continue to have high-quality Internet access, despite the performance and connectivity limitations brought about by IPv4 address exhaustion.

During the transition period, most networks will fall into three categories: This is probably what you have today, as most Internet Service Providers have only just started rolling out IPv6 support. Many devices that connect to the Internet might only support IPv4 as well. IPv4 and IPv6 networks dual-stack. This model is common in cable and dial-up networks that are transitioning. This device is called a NAT Also, mobile operators are feeling the IPv4 address exhaustion pinch most severely.

Here is a basic diagram of this configuration: Windows 8 on dual-stack networks During the transition period, dual-stack networks will be the common deployment model. Engineering resiliency into our connectivity algorithms for dual-stack networks In order for a device to truly support dual-stack networks, apps must not only be able to send traffic with IPv4 and IPv6, but the OS must be smart enough to know which protocol is appropriate for the task at hand.

Below is a diagram showing how Windows uses address sorting. To make sure that Windows 8 does not cause problems on enterprise networks, the functionality has two safeguards: If the enterprise has provided specific routing information to a particular destination, then Windows 8 will honor that preference, regardless of the connectivity determined by Windows.

In enterprise environments, Windows assumes that network administrators who configure such routes specifically thought it was a good idea to use those routes. In these networks, the proxy provides connectivity to the Internet; so end-to-end testing of IPv6 connectivity is not useful. Instead, Windows 8 simply opens connections to the proxy in the most efficient manner possible. With the release of Windows 8, some of our infrastructure services will deploy IPv6 support.

Leading the way Windows 8 is connected and ready to use, and our support of IPv6 is a key part of ensuring that connectivity for years to come. June 5, at 9: June 5, at Could you add how I could find this usable IPV6 address? That's a bit difficult It might be shown in the user interface of the router so you'd have to log in over IPv4 to find the IPv6 address.

Unfortunately not many routers do that. Well I can access the router via speedport. But ok, thanks for clearing that up. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.

Your Answer

Leave a Reply

Of course, you have to have end-to-end IPv6 connectivity to that host. E.g. if the server is not inside your own local network, you need to have IPv6 connectivity, either via your . So you can see why I need to ask for your help. The nixCraft takes a lot of my time and hard work to produce. d]/, but the browser does not connect. If I use the IPv4 address, it connects successfully. Of course, I can’t connect internet protocol version 6 ipv6, IPv6, ipv6 address, ipv6 addresses, ipv6 addressing, ipv6 browser. Long answer: IPv4 and IPv6 are different protocols. In theory you can connect from IPv6 address to IPv4 service, but you need NAT64 for this and this is .